Local elections fallout

Now that the dust has cleared and all the results have been announced, it’s time for a reflection on how the various parties have fared in the recent local elections.

Labour

It was a bad night for Labour across the country, as they ended up losing over three hundred seats in total by the time all the results were announced. Although the governing party always expects to lose seats in local elections as the electorate use it as a way of expressing their grievances with the people in power, it was more awkward for Labour in many ways because of Tony Blair’s promise to go but with no indication of when. The poor showing will undoubtably give his detractors a stick to beat him with, though probably not enough to make him step down in the next twelve months.

Conservatives

The Tories were by far the major winners in the local elections, picking up most of the seats that Labour lost, as well as taking control of eleven councils and pushing several others (including Bury) into No Overall Control. With a projected vote share of 40%, compared to the relatively poor 27% and 26% of the Lib Dems and Labour respectively, it was certainly their night at the polls.

However, the Conservatives failed to make significant gains in the major northern cities, and they still have no councillors in Manchester, Birmingham, Liverpool and several other cities. This takes some of the shine off the otherwise good showing by the Tories, because I think they really need to make some inroads into big cities if they want to return to power.

Liberal Democrats

The Lib Dems usually do well in local elections, picking up the floating voters who are dissatisfied with the government but aren’t ready to switch back to voting Conservative. This time, however, they failed to make any real progress, making a net gain of only two councillors and one council. I think there are a number of reasons for this poor performance.

First of all, the recent leadership contest and the controvesy surrounding it has rattled the Lib Dems somewhat. They have certainly lost some of their perceived integrity in the process, especially given that the previous leader and two of the leadership candidates brought the party into disrepute early on in the year.

Secondly, Campbell hasn’t really had much time to make his mark on the party or come out as a particularly strong leader. That’s not to say that he doesn’t have potential, more that he hasn’t had the opportunity to demonstrate his abilities yet. I believe it will take a few more months before we will be able to give a fair verdict on how good a leader he is.

Finally, I don’t think the Lib Dems ran a very effective campaign this year. In previous elections there have usually been Lib Dem posters all over the place, with lots of party members handing out leaflets and pushing their policies to the general public. This year I haven’t seen as much campaigning done, and the party seems to have stalled somewhat. Personally, I think that this is partially down to the fact that playing the War in Iraq card seems to be less effective, and also because of other parties (particularly the Conservatives) playing to previous Lib Dem strengths, such as their focus on environmental issues.

British National Party

At first glance, it seems as if the BNP did particularly well in the local elections, managing to double the number of council seats under their control and become the second largest party on Barking and Dagenham council. Nick Griffin was particularly buoyant when the results were announced, boasting about how well the party had performed.

However, anyone worried about a sudden rise in the far right can take assurance from two sides. First of all, whilst the BNP have indeed doubled the number of council seats they control, one has to remember that they only had twenty to start off with. If you look it as “the BNP gained just over twenty seats” instead of “the BNP more than doubled its number of seats”, then the situation doesn’t appear quite as frightening. Also, even with forty councillors, the BNP still only represents approximately 0.2% of the available seats, so they are hardly poised to take over the reigns of government.

Finally, as pointed out in Will BNP election gains last?, history would tell us that these sort of results tend not to repeat themselves. It seems unlikely that these gains for the BNP will be reflected in the next general election, and the same applies for the next round of local elections.

Green Party

The Greens made a number of important gains, increasing their seats in places where they were already strong, such as Oxford, and moving into new areas such as Islington and Camden. Unfortunately, I suspect that they are seen as a one issue party by many people (the name certainly doesn’t help dissipate this viewpoint), which probably damaged their chances of success in more urban areas such as Manchester, where they failed to make much of an impact.

Further information

Posted in General, Local Elections | Leave a comment

Boris Johnson vs Germany

A little light relief before my write-up of the recent local elections:

Boris Johnson vs Germany

Posted in General | Leave a comment

Greens looking towards electoral success

Greens outline electoral campaign via BBC News – Politics

With a degree of confidence not normally held by minority parties, the Green Party has announced that it will be fielding over 1,300 candidates in this year’s local elections, contesting over a quarter of the 4,000+ council seats that are up for grabs in May. They are apparently upbeat about making gains in several of the London boroughs, and are targetting areas such as Oxford where they already hold the balance of power and also performed better than any other minority parties in the 2005 general election.

My personal view is that this may be the first chance that the Greens have at gaining enough seats to be considered a proper political force instead of their current status as a left-wing minority party. I can’t really comment on their chances in other areas, but I think that there’s a real possibility of them gaining a seat in one of the Manchester areas if they mount a good campaign and target the right wards.

Related links

Posted in Greens, Local Elections | Leave a comment

Campbell is new Lib Dem leader

After a bitter leadership contest lasting two months and dogged by various revelations about the candidates, Sir Menzies Campbell has emerged as the new leader of the Liberal Democrats. The current Party President, Simon Hughes – initially thought to be one of the strongest contenders, was knocked out in the first round and his votes were transferred under the Single Transferable Vote system. The second round involved a close stand-off between the two remaining candidates, but in the end Campbell came out on top with 57% of the vote, beating economic affairs spokesman Chris Huhne to the post. Both defeated candidates pledged their immediate support to Campbell following the result.

Personally, I’m not sure exactly what to make of the whole leadership contest. If you’d asked me for my thoughts at the beginning, I would have probably put my money on Simon Hughes – as his role as Party President has already given him a lot of media coverage and he was generally well regarded within the party as far as I could tell. His admission that he misled people over his sexuality seems to have hurt his campaign more than I would otherwise have thought – I certainly didn’t expect him to come last out of three candidates. Huhne, on the other hand, did a lot better than I initially expected, especially for someone who only became an MP at the last general election. He’s certainly one to watch over the coming months, and could possibly use his success to bolster his chances for victory at the next leadership election, should Campbell decide to step down in the next four to five years.

It now remains to be seen whether Campbell can repair the damage done to the party over the last few months, although the recent by-election victory in Dunfermline and West Fife will help to an extent. Unless there any more scandals about to come out, the media will drift away now that the contest is over, although coverage hasn’t been anything like as much as it was for the equivalent Conservative leadership race before Christmas.

On a somewhat lighter note, it looks like it might be Gordon vs. Ming at the next general election (not really sure how Cameron fits into it, perhaps he can be Klytus?), although I’m sure Private Eye and other satirical publications have made that comment a dozen times already.

Media coverage

Posted in Liberal Democrats | Leave a comment

MPs vote to ban smoking

Tonight in the House of Commons, MPs voted overwhelmingly in favour of a total ban of smoking in all enclosed public spaces. By making the decision a free vote (meaning that the party whips will not tell members which way to vote), the government has managed to avoid too much criticism about the outcome. Although the Labour manifesto originally promised a partial ban that would not affect private members’ clubs, senior government figures, including the Prime Minister, voted in favour of a total ban.

Media coverage

Posted in House of Commons, Policies | Leave a comment

BNP leader cleared of race charges

BNP leader Nick Griffin, along with his fellow party member and activist Mark Collett, has been cleared of four of the charges brought against him relating to speeches made in 2004 that were filmed by a undercover BBC journalist. Whilst I disagree with what Griffin said in those speeches (I remember watching the documentary at the time), and I don’t believe the propaganda on the BNP web site claiming that the trial is somehow part of a plot by the government to undermine free speech, I can’t help feeling that perhaps this case has been a waste of taxpayers’ money. The problem is, as always, the fine line between free speech and inciting people to commit criminal acts, and where the line should be drawn.

Media coverage

Posted in General | Leave a comment

Total smoking ban now an option

The government has promised that the proposed changes to the law on smoking will be put to a free vote of MPs, and that a total ban on smoking in all public places will be one of the options available. Current policy is to allow smoking to continue in private clubs and pubs which do not serve food, but a split in the Cabinet has meant that a consensus cannot be reached as to which way to proceed. Other proposed measures include raising the age limit for buying tobacco products from sixteen to eighteen.

Personally I’d love to see a total ban on smoking, as I hate coming home from the pub smelling like I’ve made my way through a pack of cigarettes over the course of the evening. I disagree with the small number of Conservative and Liberal Democrat MPs who think a total ban would infringe on civil liberties by stopping people from smoking in public. Banning the sale of cigarettes to people under the age of eighteen might also help curb teenage smoking, although I’ve seen children as young as thirteen buying cigarettes over the counters so I’m not sure that an increase in the age limit would make much of a difference.

Media coverage

Posted in Policies | 2 Comments

Oaten resigns over sex scandal

Mark Oaten, who was at one point a contender for the position of leader of the Liberal Democrats, quit the front bench last night over allegations of his involvement with male prostitutes during the last six months. The announcement came after reporters from the tabloid News of the World confronted Oaten at his house with evidence of this area of his private life.

Assuming these allegations are true (I rarely automatically believe everything I read in the papers, especially not sensationalist rags like the News of the World), it is a major blow to the Liberal Democrats, and to Oaten personally. With Charles Kennedy recently admitting to having a drinking problem and the subsequent leadership contest that came about as a result of that announcement, the Lib Dems could only hope for a quick and untainted contest (or preferably the immediate appointment of one candidate without needing an election). Now they face not only the trials and tribulations of a leadership election, but also damaging stories about two of their most prominent members appearing in the national press.

What interests me most about this story though is that with the potential for defections as MPs attempt to distance themselves from the embarrassments surrounding the party, I think this is the best time for the Conservatives to make a serious return to the UK political scene. With a new leader who boasts a reasonable amount of clout and charisma without being seen as nasty, evil or a member of the Old Guard (Cameron wasn’t an MP when Thatcher was in power, which I suspect helps him to shake off the old traditions), the Tories have an excellent opportunity to steal some of the ground that the Lib Dems have taken in previous elections, and possibly even some of their MPs as well. It will certainly be intreresting to see how this all pans out in the days and weeks to come.

Media coverage

Posted in Liberal Democrats | Leave a comment

BNP top of Google News

BNP gets top news listing on Google at Guardian Unlimited – Politics

If you search for “Mary-Ann Leneghan” on Google News, the first result you come across is a news report on the BNP web site. For some reason, numerous people seemed to have got rather het up about the whole affair and have demanded that Google removes such stories from its search results, which thankfully they have refused to do – and in doing so they have earned my respect for not caving in to the politically correct crowd.

I don’t like the policies of the BNP and I’d never think about voting for them, but I could say the same thing about the Socialist Worker Party. However, you don’t see many reports of people complaining about what the extreme left parties write, even though if you follow the political spectrum you’ll find it wraps round at both ends and there isn’t a great deal of difference between how much people suffered under both fascist and communist governments.

The BNP aren’t breaking the law, at least not as far as I’m aware, nor are they being grossly offensive. Whilst I don’t necessarily agree with their claims that the BBC have double standards, I believe that the BNP has the same rights to publish their opinions on news stories as I do, and I think it’s a bit pathetic that some people want to gag an organisation that is providing them with an easy way to access hundreds of news sources in one place.

Posted in Political Correctness | Leave a comment

Galloway wasting taxpayer’s money

As I’m sure many people will have heard, The Right Honourable George Galloway MP has accepted a place as a contestant on the Channel 4 show, Celebrity Big Brother. A lot of people are angry about this, and rightly so. There is now a web page estimating how much Galloway’s time in the Big Brother house has cost the tax payer, based on his salary and how long he has not been at work doing what he is paid to – representing his constituents in Parliament and addressing their concerns on a local and national level.

If you’re a constituent of Bethnal Green and Bow and are feeling disappointed with your MP’s lack of effort in representing you, feel free to send him a message via the UK Parliament web site or write to him at the following address:

George Galloway MP
House of Commons
London
SW1A 0AA

Remember, Galloway only won his seat by a majority of 823 votes, so a couple of hundred emails and letters from angry constituents should be enough to make him buck up his ideas and get back to doing the job he is being paid for.

If you’re not one of his constituents then you shouldn’t write to Galloway directly, as MPs aren’t obliged to respond to people outside of their constituency (many will refuse to meet with lobby groups unless at least one member is a constituent – I’ve come across this issue when campaigning for Manchester MPs to sign a climate change EDM with Manchester Friends of the Earth). You can, however, write to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards and ask him to investigate whether or not Galloway is breaking the Code of Conduct for MPs by appearing on Big Brother, specifically the part where it is stated that:

Members have a general duty to act in the interests of the nation as a whole; and a special duty to their constituents.

There is also a pledge that you can sign to indicate that you will be taking this course of action and which encourages other people to do so as well.

Media coverage

Big Brother Galloway criticised at BBC News – Politics

Posted in General | 3 Comments